Inside this issue . . . CLICK
HERE to download |
![]() Cashmere: "The Fiber of Kings" Beth Creamer, Upper Marlboro, Maryland |
An Animal Fiber Expo will be held on Saturday, October 15, 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m, at the Western Maryland Research & Education Center in Keedysville, Maryland (9 miles south of Hagerstown). Speakers and presentations will relate to the following types of animal fiber: wool, mohair, cashmere, alpaca, and angora rabbit. If you are interested in raising and selling fiber as an economic enterprise, plan to attend.
The registration deadline is Friday, October 7. The registration fee is $20 per person (payable to the University of Maryland). The fee will include lunch, breaks, and conference materials. Send name, address, telephone number, and registration fee to Animal Fiber Expo, Western Maryland Research & Education Center, 18330 Keedysville Road, Keedysville, MD 21756; (301) 432-2767 x343 or 301; sschoen@umd.edu or cmason@umd.edu.
Keedysville, MD -- Due to the limited availability of hair sheep breeding stock, the hair ewe lambs currently being grazed at the Western Maryland Research & Education Center (WMREC) in Keedysville/Washington County will be offered for sale to the public via sealed bid auction.
![]() |
|
Katahdin,
Suffolk, Texel, and Dorper-sired lambs
|
The lambs are part of the University of Maryland Eastern Shore's (UMES) sire comparison study in which Katahdin ewes were mated to Suffolk, Texel, Dorper, or Katahdin rams. The offspring were born at UMES in March 2005 and are being utilized in a study on internal parasite control at WMREC. The lambs are handled bi-weekly to determine FAMACHA© eye scores, body condition scores, dagginess, and the need for deworming. The lambs are weighed every four weeks and fecal samples are collected and analyzed. Part of the grazing rotation includes two acres of chicory, a forage with anti-parasitic effects.
The following numbers of ewe lambs will be available for sale via sealed bid:
Up to 14 Katahdin ewe lambs (some eligible for registration)
Up to 14 Dorper x Katahdin ewe lambs
Up to 18 Suffolk x Katahdin ewe lambs
Up to 19 Texel x Katahdin ewe lambs
The lambs will be sorted
into groups of 3 to 6 lambs for sale. The lambs sell as-is. Unsound ewe
lambs will be eliminated from the sale. Descriptions of the lambs and sale lots
will be posted to the web at www.sheepand goat.com/hairsheeplambs.html
on September 6. Persons without Internet access can request the same information
by mail by contacting Susan Schoenian at the Western Maryland Research &
Education Center, 18330 Keedysville Road, Keedysville, MD 21756; (301) 432-2767
x343; sschoen@umd.edu or nwhitley@umes.edu.
In a sealed bid auction, participants submit a bid on paper (via mail, fax,
or e-mail), and the sale is awarded to the highest bidder. Bids should be on
a per head basis. Bids will be accepted until September 26. Winning bidders
must pick up their lambs on Saturday, October 1st, unless other arrangements
are made ahead of time.
Minimum bids will be established using prevailing market prices for slaughter lambs and hair sheep breeding stock.
Web Site: http://www.sheepandgoat.com/hairsheeplambs.html
Thurmont, MD --
Two of Beverly Pearsall's registered Texel sheep were shot on July 8 by unknown
assailants. One ewe was killed outright. A second ewe had to be putdown due
to her gunshot injuries.
According to Harold Domer, Frederick County Animal Control Director and former
police officer, the shooting is being investigated "to the fullest."
The culprits face up to three years in prison under Maryland's animal cruelty
laws.
Sadly, it was the third such incident in Frederick County recently. Three Holstein
cows were killed in two incidents last year, and in March, someone kidnapped
an alpaca. Police in Montgomery County are still looking for suspects in the
abduction and killing of a pet sheep.
Near Gettysburg (PA), a pony and dairy cow were recently shot. The 15-year-old
pony was a child's pet. The cow was pregnant. An emergency c-section was performed
to remove her calf, but the cow had to be put down. Arrest warrants have been
issued for three persons suspected of shooting the pony and cow.
Sources: Washington
Post, July 14, 2005; York Daily Record, July 28 and August 9, 2005.
The
National Sheep Improvement Program, better known by its acronym NSIP, is
a computerized, performance-based program for genetic selection in small ruminants.
Progressive breeders use NSIP data to make selection decisions in their flocks
and to advertise and sell their breeding stock.
NSIP uses the latest scientific technology to measure genetic performance and
make predictions about progeny (offspring). It works through breed associations
to deliver across-flock EPD's to participating producers. Sheep breeds that
currently participate in NSIP include Columbia, Dorset, Katahdin, Polypay, Suffolk,
and Targhee. Rambouillets, Romneys, and Boer goats (ABGA1) recently
joined the ranks of NSIP. Breeds/species which are currently being considered
for admission into NSIP include Hampshire sheep, Kiko goats, and Alpacas (IAC2).
EPD is short for "expected progeny difference." It is an estimate
of the genetic merit of an animal for a specific trait. Specifically, an EPD
is the expected difference between an animal's progeny and the average progeny
performance of all the animals in the breed for that trait. EPD's are reported
in the normal units for the trait (e.g. pounds, microns). They are expressed
as deviations from the average population value and may have a positive or negative
sign in front of them.
The positive and negative symbols don't always mean better or worse. For example,
while the progeny from a ram with a weaning weight EPD of +3.0 would be expected
to have weaning weights 3.0 lbs. more than the breed average, a ram with a fiber
diameter EPD of - 0.3 would be expected to sire lambs whose fleeces would be
0.3 microns finer (better) than the breed average.
Flock EPD's (FEPD) are the same as EPD's except that all the data is derived
from a single flock. FEPD's do not use across-flock data. For 10 years, NSIP
just calculated FEPD's for producers. Calculation of across-flock EPD's is dependent
on the establishment of good across-flock genetic linkages. Genetic linkages
are created when rams are sold or traded and progeny are distributed into many
flocks.
Across flock EPD's allow comparison of sheep under different management conditions.
For example, comparisons can be made between animals that are raised on grass
and those which are fed grain and between animals raised in Maryland and those
raised in Texas. NSIP does not allow comparison between different breeds.
NSIP evaluates many economically important traits including maternal (number
of lambs born, maternal milk, and milk+growth), growth (weaning weight, post-weaning
weight, and yearling weight), and wool (grease fleece weight, fiber diameter,
and fiber length). NSIP is in the process of adding evaluation for carcass traits
(fat thickness, ribeye area, and carcass value), accelerated lambing (date of
first lambing, lambing interval), fecal egg counts, and ewe productivity (lbs.
lamb weaned per ewe lambing). Breed associations determine which traits are
important to their breed. For example, Targhees, Columbias, and Rambouillets
receive genetic evaluations for wool traits, while (in the future) Polypay breeders
will receive data on accelerated lambing and Katahdin breeders will receive
fecal egg count and ewe productivity EPD's.
The cost of participating in NSIP is only $50 per flock, plus $1.25 per breeding
animal. Producers enter data into an electronic data form and send it to their
breed coordinator, where the data is compiled, checked, and sent to the NSIP
computer at Virginia Tech. After EPD's are calculated, the results are sent
back to the breed associations, who process the reports and send them to individual
producers. Breed associations also publish breed or sire summaries. Most of
the work of NSIP is done over the Internet.
NSIP was implemented in 1987, but unfortunately is not widely used by sheep
producers, despite dramatic genetic progress in the beef, swine, and dairy industries
using the same technology. Producers interested in NSIP should contact their
respective breed associations or NSIP directly at (303) 771-5717 or info@nsip.org.
1
American Boer Goat Association
2
International Alpaca Community
Web site: http://www.nsip.org
by
Kelly Vorac Cole3
Jefferson, Maryland
The aim of this article
is to educate sheep and goat producers about the value of using ultrasound when
selecting breeding stock. Research shows that the heritability of loin eye is
very high at 50%. However, the data set collected from Suffolk ram lambs at
the 2004 Pennsylvania ram test suggests that loin eyes need improvement. See
Table 2.
Situation
The U.S. sheep industry is very fragmented today. Two very large segments have
emerged in the industry -- the frame show-type sheep and the wether sheep shown
in market classes. A similar situation is emerging in the meat goat industry.
The problem is that both of these segments are shifting away from the core values
of commercial meat production. Ultimately, all sheep and goats must have the
carcass traits required to satisfy the consumers. Selection for these carcass
traits will be key. If the sheep and goat industries are going to become viable
commercial meat entities, they must return to the basic core values held by
the commercial swine and cattle industry. Those core values are performance
and carcass traits. This article will focus on the latter.
Carcass traits
In sheep and goats, hind saddle, loineye, and rack are the highest priced cuts
of meat. These are the same traits valued in swine and beef. The swine industry
has done a tremendous job increasing loineye area. They have done this by collecting
data using ultrasound technology, which can measure loineye area in the live
animal. Live evaluation allows selection for increased loin area. Loineye area
(LEA) is one of the most highly heritable traits at 50% heritability. See
Table 1. This high heritability indicates how easy it should be to increase
LEA. In just 10 years, the swine industry increased loineye measurements from
4 to 5 square inches to 6-8 square inches that amounts to a 50-60% increase
in loin area.
Carcass Evaluation with Ultrasound technologies
Since the 1950's, ultrasound technology for biological application has been
available for use. Ultrasound consists of very high frequency sound waves. Pulses
are produced in a transducer by the vibrations of piezoelectric crystals. These
pulses are transmitted through tissue until they reach a tissue interface, such
as between fat and lean tissue. Ultrasound images appear in various colors and
shades on the display unit. Bone and fat will appear white in color, while muscle
and tissue will appear a dense grey color.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
Body composition measurements
are taken with an Aloka 500 real-time ultrasound machine equipped with a 3.5
MHz transducer designed for animal use. In the normal scenario for estimating
carcass traits via ultrasound, a "Certified Technician" travels to
a designated location with portable ultrasound equipment. The technician would
apply a "couplant" (usually vegetable oil) to the back of the animal
at a designated location. The couplant prevents the interference of air between
the transducer and the animal. This allows for maximum conduction of sound waves.
Real-time ultrasound will allow for an image to be produced immediately. This
image can be captured to a computer's hard drive allowing for the images to
be interpreted at a later time. Ultrasound measurements for backfat thickness
(BF; Figure 1) and longissimus dorsi area, which is the LEA, (Figure 1) are
taken between the 12th and 13th ribs on each animal.
Loineye area is measured
in square inches and is positively and highly correlated with percent retail
product (% RP). This trait is a moderately high heritable (0.4 to 0 .6) trait.
This means that the trait will be passed on to progeny. Ultrasound measurements
of LEA are accurate within one square inch of the actual LEA measurement. There
is a 62 -94 % relationship between the ultrasound values and measurements taken
on the carcass at slaughter. Much of this variation may be due to the accuracy
of the technician. Backfat thickness is measured in inches, and is a good indicator
of % RP. However, unlike LEA, it is negatively and highly correlated with %RP.
This means, as BF increases, % RP decreases. This trait is similar to LEA in
heritability (>0.4). Ultrasound measurements of BF are accurate to within
0.07 inches of the actual carcass BF. Ultrasound BF is highly correlated (0.96)
with carcass BF. Some believe ultrasound BF may be more accurate than carcass
BF, because of the fact that no BF has been removed during the ultrasound process.
Unlike in the packing plant, varying amounts of BF may be removed when the hide
is removed from the carcass.
How Does a Producer Use Ultrasound Information?
Proper use of ultrasound data involves an understanding of its limitations.
For example, rams having LEA measurements of 2.7 and 2.8 square inches are likely
not detectably different. However, we could be more confident that a ram having
an ultrasound LEA of 3.0 square inches is more muscular than a ram whose LEA
measures 2.0 square. Ultrasound measurements may be most useful to distinguish
which sheep and goats are above average, average, or below average compared
to their contemporaries (e.g. flock mates), or within sire groups. One should
closely monitor BF; this is an indicator of development of the animal and/or
the maturity status of the animal. One must remember these are just a couple
of traits to evaluate, and one should not get carried away with single-trait
selection. With single-trait selection, one may be creating more problems than
what they may be attempting to correct. Before embarking on the selection of
future genetics, one must have a defined set of goals established for their
own operation.
Hopefully, you are beginning to see that you can use ultrasound technology to
measure the LEA on live animals rather than harvesting the animals and doing
actual measurements of the hanging carcasses. Producers should take advantage
of this opportunity for evaluation and selection of breeding stock. Many State
ram and buck test stations collect ultrasound information for participating
producers. Table 2 shows a subset of the data collected from the 2004 Suffolk
ram test; a total of 16 Junior rams were on test. The LEA were adjusted for
125 pounds.
Cause for Concern:
Please note the 125-pound loin eye measurements in Table 2. These young
rams should represent a good cross section of progressive breeders in the Northeast.
Note that the average loin eye is 2.49. Further note that the average drops
to 1.94 square inches when ram number 30 is omitted from the data set.
|
Table
2. Suffolk Junior Ram Lambs from 2004 Pennsylvania Ram Test
|
|||||
|
Ram
ID |
Weight
(lbs) |
LEA
(in2) |
Adj.
LEA
(in2) |
Adj.
BF
(in) |
Genetic type |
|
28
|
163
|
2.29
|
1.93
|
0.15
|
Frame
|
|
29
|
183
|
3.27
|
2.65
|
0.13
|
Wether
|
|
30
|
176
|
4.50
|
3.97
|
0.17
|
Wether
|
|
31
|
186
|
2.52
|
1.86
|
0.14
|
Frame
|
|
32
|
161
|
2.80
|
2.46
|
0.20
|
English
|
|
33
|
160
|
3.25
|
2.90
|
0.13
|
Wether
|
|
34
|
176
|
3.18
|
2.65
|
0.16
|
Frame/wether
|
|
35
|
148
|
2.32
|
2.15
|
0.15
|
Frame
|
|
36
|
156
|
2.55
|
2.28
|
0.12
|
Frame
|
|
37
|
143
|
1.77
|
1.67
|
0.17
|
Frame
|
|
38
|
146
|
2.76
|
2.60
|
0.18
|
Wether
|
|
39
|
156
|
3.05
|
2.78
|
0.15
|
Wether
|
The sheep and goat industry in the U.S. has not adapted selection technology as quickly as the swine and beef industries. In reading this article, we hope that you see a great tool that could greatly benefit the sheep and goat industry. Let's use this technology to increase the percentage of retail cuts. Research has shown that LEA is highly heritable. We believe this technology can increase the value of American lamb and goat, which will increase profitability to our farmers.
|
"Once I chose to focus on breeding for loin eye, I found it very difficult to find sires that could increase carcass traits such as loin eye without first measuring the LEA of the ram and collecting real data. I have made many mistakes choosing rams that I thought had large loin eyes based on visual appeal, only to find that is was not there when the offspring were born." John Hall, Suffolk breeder and Extension Agent, Kent County |
For further information on ultrasound technology, contact Willard Lemaster (Lemaster@umd.edu), Susan Schoenian (sschoen@umd.edu), or Niki Whitley (nwhitley@umes.edu).
3Kelly is a Suffolk breeder in Jefferson Maryland. She received assistance on the article from J. Willard Lemaster, 4-H Animal Science Extension Specialist, University of Maryland; John Hall, Kent County Extension Agent and Suffolk breeder; and Susan Schoenian, Sheep and Goat Specialist.
Straightbred Boer (n =
42), Spanish (n = 47), and Kiko (n = 38) does were evaluated for fitness traits
(hardiness) by researchers at Tennessee State University. Does were managed
together on pasture from September 2003 to October 2004. Three quarters of each
breed were mated in October and the remainder bred in December. Herd health
records were analyzed to assess animal fitness.
The herd was not vaccinated for hoof rot. Does were treated for hoof rot and
hoof scald upon observed lameness. Boer does required more treatments for lameness
than Spanish or Kiko does. More Boer does required multiple hoof treatments
than Spanish or Kiko does.
|
Hoof
treatments
|
Dewormings
|
|||
| Doe Breed |
Cases
per doe
|
%
|
Cases
per doe
|
%
|
| Boer |
1.77
|
52.3
|
0.53
|
40.5
|
| Spanish |
0.60
|
19.2
|
0.11
|
6.4
|
| Kiko |
0.47
|
10.5
|
0.07
|
2.6
|
Does were dewormed as a group in January (ivermectin) and individually at kidding (moxidectin). Does kidding in March were also dewormed as a group in June (moxidectin). Individual does presenting clinical signs of internal parasitism during the year received additional treatments of moxidectin. Additional treatments were more numerous for Boer does than for Spanish or Kiko. More Boer does received extra dewormings during the year than Spanish or Kiko does. Fecal egg counts were determined on a random subset of does as kids approached 3 months of age. Geometric means for fecal egg counts (FEC) were 606, 307, and 237 for Boer, Kiko, and Spanish does, respectively.
| Doe Breed |
No.
|
FEC
|
%
does that
weaned kids |
%
does that
remained in herd |
| Boer |
42
|
606
|
76
|
79
|
| Spanish |
47
|
237
|
96
|
98
|
| Kiko |
38
|
307
|
100
|
100
|
Fewer Boer does weaned kids and survived through the production year as compared to Spanish and Kiko does. These preliminary results suggest differences among meat goat breeds for fitness under southeastern U.S. conditions.
Source: Abstracts: Joint meeting of the American Society of Animal Science, American Society of Dairy Science, and Canadian Society of Animal Science, Cincinnati, Ohio. July 2005.
by Carol
Delaney
Small Ruminant Dairy Specialist
University of Vermont
Ideally, the offspring of a goat or sheep is raised by its dam for optimum health
and immune system development. Weaning animals at a young age as a compromise
to collect the milk for our use, leaves those young stock more vulnerable to
disease. When a flush of kidding starts and the kid pens are not kept as clean
as necessary, the wee ones can get a high dose of coccidia. The source is the
ingestion of fecal matter from older animals who have had a chance to develop
some immunity and are shedding spores or oocytes. The kids can't handle a high
dose before their immune systems are ready to fight back and painful and bloody
scouring occurs. Dairy replacement lambs on pasture can pick up coccidia spores
from adult fecal matter and may develop bad scours.
When farmers face these extreme cases in a normally well managed herd or flock,
they often treat with coccidiostats to beat back the infection and save animals
from death. This treatment can arrest the proliferation of the coccidia that
are invading, disrupting and causing inflammation and bleeding in the intestinal
wall. However, it does nothing to help the intestine heal back.
At the Alternative and Herbal Livestock Health Conference4 held in
Storrs, Connecticutt (Oct. 20-21, 2000), Drs. Sandoval and Miller presented
convincing data of their research with Uncaria tomentosa, uña de Gato
or Cat''s Claw. Cat's Claw is a vine that quickly grows in Peru and the bark
is harvested for its medicinal value. In their research trials, they caused
chronic intestinal inflammation in rats artificially with indomethacin and later
infected chickens with coccidia oocytes. Both cases produced pronounced disruption
of the mucosal architecture with loss of villi as shown in histological sections
of the ileum. When Cat's Claw was prepared as a decoction (5 gms bark simmered
30 minutes in a liter of water) and given to the rats and chickens, there was
marked improvement and repair of the damaged intestinal wall as compared to
the control groups.
While Cat's Claw is not a coccidiostat (as natural rearing or cleanliness as
prevention and drugs as a treatment are), it is very useful in helping the animal
to more quickly recover and may prevent some scarring. The damage and pain are
resolved and the intestinal wall is brought back to doing its job of absorbing
nutrients and protecting the body from infection. Its actions are anti-inflammatory
and demulcent. Cat's Claw can be ordered at health food stores or from herbal
catalogs.
Reprinted with permission from the author.
4Conference proceedings are available from NOFA-Vermont (www.nofavt.org, info@nofavt.org, or (802) 434-4122).
A joint study was carried
out by USDA-ARS (Pullman, WA) and North Dakota State University to determine
the association between scrapie prion genotypes at codon 171 and 136 and various
production traits. Traits assessed include age, live weight (LW), carcass weight
(CW), dressing percentage, back fat thickness (BF), body wall thickness, ribeye
area (REA), flank streaking, and percent boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts
(BCTRC). The data from 824 market lambs was analyzed.
No differences were observed between lambs with codon 136AA or 136AV for LW,
CW, BF, body wall thickness, REA, flank streaking, or BCTRC; however, 136AV
lambs were older than 136AA lambs. Codon 171RR lambs weighed less then codon
171QR lambs and 171QQ lambs. 171RR lambs had lower carcass weights than 171QR
and 171QQ lambs. There were no differences in dressing percentage. 171QQ lambs
tended to have more back fat than either QR or RR lambs. Body wall thickness
was less in RR lambs vs. QR or QQ lambs. REA was larger for QQ lambs as compared
to QR and RR lambs. RR lambs had a larger BCTRC than QQ lambs.
|
LW
(lbs)
|
CW
(lbs)
|
BF
(in)
|
REA
(in2)
|
% BCTRC
|
|
|
171RR
|
113.7
|
57.2
|
0.172
|
2.25
|
47.4
|
|
171QR
|
117.9
|
60.3
|
0.172
|
2.33
|
---
|
|
171QQ
|
117.9
|
61.8
|
0.192
|
2.45
|
47.0
|
The data suggest association between scrapie genotypes and production traits and a need for further study.
Source: Abstracts: Joint meeting of the American Society of Animal Science, American Society of Dairy Science, and Canadian Society of Animal Science, Cincinnati, Ohio. July 2005.
Caprine arthritic encephalitis
(CAE) is a significant and costly disease of goats. It was first recognized
in the early 1970's. It is a lenti/retro-virus, similar to ovine
progressive pneumonia (OPP/in sheep), maedi-visna,
and AIDS (in humans). CAE and OPP are about 70% similar in their genes and can
experimentally infect both sheep and goats, though under normal husbandry practices,
transfer of CAE from goats to sheep is unlikely and vice versa.
The most efficient manner of transmission of CAE is from dam to kid by ingesting
colostrum or milk from infected does. Horizontal transmission of CAE has been
documented. When uninfected goats are housed with infected goats, a significant
number of uninfected goats become infected. Transmission from doe to kid before
or during parturition (kidding) has also been documented.
![]() |
|
Arthritis
is the most
common form of CAE. |
Prevalence
The prevalence
of CAE is high in countries with goat-dairying industries where goats are intensively
managed and confinement housing is routinely practiced. The feeding of pooled
colostrum or milk has been identified as a practice associated with increased
prevalence of CAE. Fiber goats (and probably meat goats) have a much lower worldwide
prevalence of CAE because they tend to be raised extensively on range land,
with kids nursing their own dams.
The prevalence of CAE in goats in the United States, Canada, and Europe ranges from 38% to 81%. However, goats can carry CAE their entire lives and never show an outward sign of it. Clinical arthritis is estimated to occur in less than 25% of seropositive goats. There may be a genetic predisposition to infection in certain breeds and within family lines of those breeds.
Symptoms
The effects of CAE on health and production are numerous. CAE can cause chronic
disease in several body systems; however, most infected animals do not show
clinical signs. Four clinical syndromes have been described for CAE-infected
goats: arthritis, leukoencephalo-myelitis, interstitial pneumonia, and mastitis.
Arthritis is the most common form of CAE. Chronic progressive arthritis is seen
in goats older than 6 months and is usually characterized by swelling of one
or both carpal joints. The time course is variable, with some animals deteriorating
over a few years and others remaining stable for several years. As the disease
progresses, animals become lame or recumbent and debilitated. Animals experience
weigh loss, poor performance, and increased culling. Early signs of arthritis
may be subtle. Progressive weight loss is sometimes the only sole clinical manifestation
of the CAE virus.
Goats with mastitis or "hardbag", caused by the CAE virus, have depressed
levels of milk production. CAE-infected does produce up to 25% less milk than
non-infected does. Kids with the neurologic form almost always die.
Treatment
There are no known treatments for any of the clinical forms of CAE. Animals
with mild cases can be made more comfortable. Goats with advance cases should
be humanely euthanized.
Eradication
CAE can be eradicated from a goat herd. CAE testing can be done on blood samples
from suspected goats. The ELISA test is preferred to the AGID test, because
it is more sensitive. Detection of serum antibody to the CAE virus confirms
infection in goats, but does not prove the existence of clinical disease. Goats
testing positive for CAE antibodies should be culled from the herd or segregated,
as they are a potential source of CAE infection for other animals. Since the
main source of CAE is the colostrum of infected does, positive does should be
removed from the herd. If positive does are retained, then their kids should
be removed from their dam at birth and fed colostrum from uninfected does or
colostrum that has been pasteurized to inactivate any virus present.
The following management protocol should significantly reduce CAE in a herd
by eliminating transmission of CAE in colostrum and milk. Kids should be removed
from the dam immediately after birth. Kids should be isolated from older animals
and given colostrum that has been heat treated at 56 C for 1 hour. At this temperature,
the virus is inactivated, but the immumogloblins remain intact. Kids then need
to be kept isolated and raised on pasteurized goat or cow milk or milk replacer.
Click HERE to read about CAE testing your herd.
Zoonoses
There is no evidence to suggest that people can become infected with CAE by
drinking raw goat's milk.
References: Goat Medicine by Mary Smith and David Sherman (1994); and Sheep & Goat Medicine by David Pugh ( 2002).
![]() |
|
Polled
Rambouillet Ram
|
The Rambouillet is a direct
descendent of the Spanish Merino. The breed began when the King of Spain ordered
that a small flock of Spanish Merinos be exported to Louis XVI's estate at Rambouillet,
France. A total of 318 ewes, 141 rams, and 7 wethers arrived at the farm on
October 12, 1786. It was the first significant release of Merinos to the outside
world and except for one small addition, provided the sole basis of the eventual
Rambouillet breed.
After the Spanish Empire
began to collapse, Merinos found their way throughout the globe, mixing and
mingling with various breeds and types. However, the strain assembled at Rambouillet
remained unusually pure. In the mid 1800's, a few American breeders began importing
Rambouillet rams to cross onto domestic flocks of Merinos. A select group of
sheepman chose to maintain pure Rambouillet stock. They established the American
Rambouillet Association in 1889.
Rambouillets are raised in a wide variety of climatic conditions, from the scarce
brush area of Texas to the extreme cold winters of Wisconsin. They are the foundation
of most western range flocks, but have also found popularity in the farm flock
states.
Rambouillet rams range from 250 to 300 lbs.; ewes from 150 to 200 lbs. There
are horned and polled lines of Rambouillets. Many Rambouillet rams have big,
massive horns, while ewes do not. Under range conditions, Rambouillet ewes typically
raise single lambs, while farm-bred ewes frequently exceed a 200 percent lamb
crop. Rambouillets are a dual-purpose sheep. They are noted for their superior,
long staple, dense, fine wool. The average Rambouillet ewe will shear 10 lbs.
or more of wool per year. Besides being valued for their high-quality wool,
Rambouillets are also a good meat sheep. Rambouillet lambs are large framed
and fast-growing.
Web site: http://www.rambouilletsheep.org
Click HERE
to learn about more than 80 breeds of sheep worldwide.
August
27
Virginia Performance-Tested Ram Lamb Sale
Steeles Tavern, Virginia
Info : Dr. Scott Greiner at (540) 237-9159 or sgreiner@vt.edu.
September
3
6th Annual Virginia Tech Sheep Center Production Sale
Virginia Tech Campus, Blacksburg, Virginia
Info: Dr. Scott Greiner at (540) 237-9159 or sgreiner@vt.edu.
September 9
Integrated Parasite Management (IPM/FAMACHA©) Workshop
Tioga County, Pennsylvania
Info: Craig Williams at (570) 724-9120 or jcw17@psu.edu
September 11
Integrated Parasite Management (IPM/FAMACHA©) Workshop
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York
Info: Dr. tatiana Stanton at (607) 255-3215 or tls7@cornell.edu
October 6-8
North American Hair Sheep Symposium
San Angelo, Texas
Info: Dr. Frank Craddock at (325) 653-4576 or b-craddock@tamu.edu.
October 13-14
Sheep Basics Workshop at Virginia Tech
Info: Dr. Scott Greiner at (540) 237-9159 or sgreiner@vt.edu.
October 15 --
CANCELLED --
Animal Fiber Expo
Western Maryland Research & Education Center
Keedysville, Maryland
Info: Susan at (301) 432-2767 or sschoen@umd.edu.
October 22
Maryland Sheep Breeders Association Annual Meeting and Banquet
Carroll County Ag Center, Westminster, Maryland
Info: David Delamater at (410) 476-3821 or sweetface@goeaston.com
October 28-29
Pennsylvania Sheep, Goat, Grazing and Production Conference
Somerset, Pennsylvania
Info: Charlie Cathcart at (717) 349-2511 or charlesp@innernet.net
October 29
Virginia Bred Ewe Sale
Rockingham County Fairgrounds
Info: Corey Childs at (703) 777-0373 or cchilds@vt.edu
November 3-5
11th Great Lakes Dairy Sheep Symposium
Burlington, Vermont
Info: Carol Delaney at (802) 656-0915 or carol.delaney@uvm.edu
For a complete list of Sheep and Goat Events, click HERE.
Links are provided as an information service. They do not constitute an endorsement of any non-affiliated organizations, businesses, products or content of these pages by Maryland Cooperative Extension or the University of Maryland. Mention of product names is for information purposes only. It is the policy of Maryland Cooperative Extension that no person shall be subjected to discrimination on the grounds of race, color, sex, disability, age, religion or national origin.
The
Maryland Sheep & Goat Producer is published bi-monthly by
University of Maryland Cooperative Extension. It is written and edited
by Susan Schoenian, Area Agent for Sheep and Goats at the Western Maryland
Research & Education Center. Dr. Niki Whitley from the University
of Maryland Eastern Shore (UMES) is a regular contributor to the newsletter.
She can be reached at (410) 651-6194 or nwhitley@umes.edu.
To receive the newsletter, contact the Western Maryland Research &
Education Center: 18330 Keedysville Road, Keedysville, MD 21756, (301)
432-2767 ext. 343 or 301, fax (301) 432-4089; or e-mail: sschoen@umd.edu
or cmason@umd.edu. The cost of receiving
the newsletter by mail is $10 per year payable to the University of Maryland.
The newsletter is free when accessed via the Internet. You can
be added to a list to receive an e-mail message when a new newsletter
has been posted to the web at http://www.
sheep andgoat.com/ news/index.html. Comments and suggestions regarding
the newsletter are always welcome. Articles may be reprinted with permission
of the author(s). Article submissions are encouraged. |
Go to Previous Issue of Maryland Sheep and Goat Producer Newsletter.
Go to Main Newsletter Page.
Return to the Maryland Small Ruminant Page.
Return to the Western Maryland Research & Education Center (Sheep and Goats).